Anyway, as I said before the OP before I wasted my time.
You can either think things clearly and carefully, or you can go full "follow your dreams d'awwww" while I ride away in my unicorn and we all eat magic donuts made of pieces of rainbow.
Hearing advice from people isn't always easy, specially when it's not a pat in the back. But being mature is necessary to understand that.
Also, @Touchfuzzy please don't use exagerations like "financial disaster" from now on. That doesn't exist, there is only black and white.
The irony here, is that you're the one who's arguing in black and whites here when you set up the false
dichotomy of
A.) either thinking things clearly and carefully, or
B.) going full "follow your dreams d'awwww"
Setting up following your dreams as being the road to "financial disaster" is the black-white perspective,
not the other way around.
The fact that you now call it an "exaggeration", after I did you the courtesy of interpreting like such
(I.E as meaning poor, or lower class, rather than 100% bankrupt) which you then replied to in a way
as if to suggest that was wrong of me, you're now being disingenuous - but whatever, right?
As was patently obvious by my post, seeing as I did qualify my position several times over -
If you don't have much to lose, then taking a "big risk" is not a big risk at all.
I agree with the gist of the majority in this thread - which is that for 99% of people, taking the
stable route is advisable - however, to pretend as if the OP following his dreams granted that
he doesn't have ****-loads of student loan debts, or a family to support, is going to automatically
lead him to financial ruin is absurd, and since this isn't the case,
I don't see the point of you raising that concern to begin with.
Sum sumarum, unless you meant to imply that ditching the engineer degree now, or
willy-nilly dream chasing will lead to financial disaster, what was the point?
I'm the one making the grey argument here - namely that financial disaster is the blackest of black
alternatives here, and that you don't inherently end up there just because you ditch a useful
university degree. The fact that you fool yourself into thinking otherwise, is very telling.
But then again, you're apparently the kind of guy that instead of making an actual reply addressing this
point, makes an indirect, snarky and passive aggressive comment about it whilst addressing someone else,
so I am not going to expect reasonable positions or dialogue from you on this matter.
Cheers,