RPG Maker Forums
Hi ..
I find this result quite surprising but also very interesting.
https://jsperf.com/function-calls-direct-vs-apply-vs-call-vs-bind/6
But following this result, I ask myself an anecdotal question.
I would like to reassure myself that I understood the principle of performance.
I use a lot of hud with lots complex animation, and I find myself having to duplicate inside objects, lots of clone function that this repeats from one object to another.
I would purify the codes, but I am falling on this resulta that left me puzzled.
In my context as an example.
So, example here, I have this.
The second technique is, therefore, cleaner, but much less performance effective in theory?
So the direct method will remain more logical, even if I have to repeat some cloning functions in the constructor. ?
It is not the weight that disturbs me, but rather the performances for access to information
I find this result quite surprising but also very interesting.
https://jsperf.com/function-calls-direct-vs-apply-vs-call-vs-bind/6
But following this result, I ask myself an anecdotal question.
I would like to reassure myself that I understood the principle of performance.
I use a lot of hud with lots complex animation, and I find myself having to duplicate inside objects, lots of clone function that this repeats from one object to another.
I would purify the codes, but I am falling on this resulta that left me puzzled.
In my context as an example.
So, example here, I have this.
Code:
//1: OUTSIDE: //EXAMPLE STATUS() ARE IN EATCH OBJ
//WHEN GAME BOOT BUILD THIS
$gameVariables.obj1 = new obj1(NewPid);
$gameVariables.obj2 = new obj2(NewPid);
$gameVariables.obj3 = new obj3(NewPid);
//CONSTRUCTOR
function obj1(NewPid) {
//EXAMPLE STATUS ARE INSIDE EATCH OBJ
this.Status = function(){if($gameScreen._pictures[this.Pid()]!==undefined){return true;}return false;}
this.Pid = function() { return this.NewPid }; // RETURN INITIAL PID
}
function obj2(NewPid) {
//EXAMPLE STATUS ARE INSIDE EATCH OBJ
this.Status = function(){if($gameScreen._pictures[this.Pid()]!==undefined){return true;}return false;}
this.Pid = function() { return this.NewPid }; // RETURN INITIAL PID
}
function obj......(NewPid) {
}
//__________________________________________________________________________________________________
//2: OUTSIDE: //EXAMPLE STATUS() ARE NOT IN EATCH OBJ AND ARE CALLED FROM OUTSIDE
GetStatusInObject = function(){
if($gameScreen._pictures[this.Pid()]!==undefined){return true;}return false;
}
GetStatusInObject.call(obj1);So the direct method will remain more logical, even if I have to repeat some cloning functions in the constructor. ?
It is not the weight that disturbs me, but rather the performances for access to information
Latest Threads
-
-
-
Does Generator Parts DLC will overwrite the one in my folder? (4 Viewers)- Started by Zeecry
- Replies: 1
-
Latest Posts
Latest Profile Posts
Our latest feature is an interview with... me?!
forums.rpgmakerweb.com
Spotlights/Features - RPG Maker Feature: Nick 'Touchfuzzy' Palmer
Spotlight: @Touchfuzzy (Tagging yourself is...
People4_2 (Capelet off and on) added!
forums.rpgmakerweb.com
Tonbi's MZ material factory
That is ok. I know the rest of the Actor 3 Set...
Just beat the last of us 2 last night and starting jedi: fallen order right now, both use unreal engine & when I say i knew 80% of jedi's buttons right away because they were the same buttons as TLOU2 its ridiculous, even the same narrow hallway crawl and barely-made-it jump they do. Unreal Engine is just big budget RPG Maker the way they make games nearly identical at its core lol.
