RMMV Strange Armor Penetration Stacking (YEP_X_ArmorScaling)

Frostorm

[]D[][]V[][]D aka "Staf00"
Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,670
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
So I noticed that when I stack multiple instances of the tag <Physical Armor Penetration: x%>, the result isn't added together correctly, nor is it added multiplicatively. For instance, I have a character w/ a passive state that grants +50% Armor Pen, then I equip an Axe that supposedly grants +10% Armor Pen. The result should be either +60% if calculated additively (0.5 + 0.1 = 0.6) or +65% if calculated multiplicatively (1.5 * 1.1 = 1.65). However, the result I'm getting is +55% Armor Pen...
1627432951105.png
 

caethyril

^_^
Global Mod
Joined
Feb 21, 2018
Messages
2,771
Reaction score
2,122
First Language
EN
Primarily Uses
RMMZ
I think the "damage stopped by armor" is stacking multiplicatively:
  • 50% pen => armor applies to 50% of damage
  • 10% pen => armor applies to 90% of damage
Put together: armor applies to 50% * 90% = 45% of damage, i.e. 55% armor penetration.

This is similar to element rates vs resistances.
 

Frostorm

[]D[][]V[][]D aka "Staf00"
Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,670
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
Hmm, in that case...how can I phrase the descriptions so that the player doesn't feel misled?
 

ATT_Turan

Forewarner of the Black Wind
Veteran
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
1,844
Reaction score
965
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
I wouldn't feel the need to explain it any special way. Your confusion notwithstanding, that functionality is pretty common in video games.

And do you expect your players are going to be fighting enemies, recording their damage, then changing gear, fighting the same enemies, recording the damage again, and comparing it to reverse engineer the stats on their items? Or just see the numbers on this item are better than the numbers on that item, so I'll use it.
 

Frostorm

[]D[][]V[][]D aka "Staf00"
Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,670
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
Lol, good point...I guess I'm just being overly paranoid.
 

Frostorm

[]D[][]V[][]D aka "Staf00"
Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,670
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
So I was actually able to get the result I wanted by editing the plugin somewhat.

Before:
JavaScript:
Game_Battler.prototype.physicalArmorPenetrationRate = function() {
    var value = 1.0;
    if ($gameParty.inBattle()) value *= 1 - $gameSystem.armorPenetrationRate();
    for (var i = 0; i < this.states().length; ++i) {
      var state = this.states()[i];
      if (state) value *= 1.0 - state.physArmorPenRate;
    }
    return value;
};

After:
JavaScript:
Game_Battler.prototype.physicalArmorPenetrationRate = function() {
    var value = 1.0;
    if ($gameParty.inBattle()) value *= 1 - $gameSystem.armorPenetrationRate();
    for (var i = 0; i < this.states().length; ++i) {
      var state = this.states()[i];
      if (state) value -= state.physArmorPenRate;
    }
    return value;
};

Basically, it turned it into an additive formula by changing...
value *= 1.0 - state.physArmorPenRate;
...to...
value -= state.physArmorPenRate;
Now I just gotta do this across the board for all the notetags lol.

Edit: Hmm, I need a 2nd opinion...should I allow it to go negative? If not, I'll need to add this line:
if (value <= 0) value == 0;
 
Last edited:

caethyril

^_^
Global Mod
Joined
Feb 21, 2018
Messages
2,771
Reaction score
2,122
First Language
EN
Primarily Uses
RMMZ
Basically, it turned it into an additive formula by changing...
value *= 1.0 - state.physArmorPenRate;
...to...
value -= state.physArmorPenRate;
I think personally I'd just change the status display, either:
  • Show the element rates as resistances (1 - rate), or
  • Show the armor penetration as "armor damage" or something (1 - pen).
Edit: Hmm, I need a 2nd opinion...should I allow it to go negative? If not, I'll need to add this line:
if (value <= 0) value == 0;
Negative armor penetration would mean that you're experiencing more resistance from armor than usual. If that makes sense in some in-game situation then sure, go for it. Otherwise, remember that you need to use a single = for assignment: == is a loose equality check.
 

Frostorm

[]D[][]V[][]D aka "Staf00"
Veteran
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
1,965
Reaction score
1,670
First Language
English
Primarily Uses
RMMV
Oh, that's right...I need to use a single "=" instead of two, thx!
 

Latest Threads

Latest Profile Posts

Lately I have been taking a break from game and resource making so I won't get burnt out. But I am also interested in the Game Jams this site periodically holds. It'd be great if I knew when the next one, if any, is planned.
elexy 1.2.pngSome bust art to be cropped and cleaned. May use in special decision moments. Depending on how it looks in game I may cut it.
Tiamat-86 wrote on ATT_Turan's profile.
apparently since its turning 15 years old this year the ps3 is considered "retro". now how old do you feel?
guess that means im an "antique" gamer since ill still play games as old as i am.
"you know your getting old when your childhood console changes ethnicity" lol it turned yellow
I'm making Toilet in Wonderland 2. and tell vinny about it lol

Forum statistics

Threads
115,345
Messages
1,089,174
Members
150,021
Latest member
Jackitrick
Top