- Joined
- Apr 7, 2015
- Messages
- 275
- Reaction score
- 53
- First Language
- Spinash
- Primarily Uses
Hi, yes. Is this God? I got your message. I'm definitely studying russian now.the Russian language is very rich in swear words
Now, I do have to say about this matter. I've looked some of the opinions here and I disagree with so many that I want to be disagreed with too.
The point of swearing, and I'm saying this as a person that swears like a fricking cossack, is adding empahis. "What the fricker-frackers are you talking about?" doesn't nearly sound as blunt as saying "what in the seven circles of F-uck are you talking about?". It's noticeable that the second one it's more attractive (in the sense that it does a better job in getting your attention) than the first one.
Swearing can also be used as a mean to offend, and it is the most common use. Y'all know the deal. "Sonova*****", "Piece of ****", "Arsehole" as per northamerican standards and "Tit" as per British standards... In this situation it's a lazy resource, but it works well. It doesn't require much thought and it tends to have the desired effect plus the extra relieving feel when you get that **** out of your system. Of course, there are people that just can't be offended by any of that and those may need some more elaborate insults, but for the common folk "I Frick-ed your mother" works wonders.
On the subject that swearing is lazy and silly as a general resource, allow me to quote myself:
I heard that the first time I went to Ireland and I was marvelled at it, I would have never though about using that permutation of words. Honestly, if you think only stupid people resort to sweaing, I'd recommend you to either hear Sir Stephen Fry's opinion on the matter or go to Ireland. I mean it, it's certainly stunning how the Irish can find a way to make "F-uck" the most offensive word on the english dictionary. Now now, don't tell me that Irish are stupid, because that would be fricken racist.what in the seven circles of F-uck is that?
And, as a one last addition to my post to make my point clear, not all profanity is swear but all swear is profanity at least from my country's point of view.
For example, because examples always work:
That would be profanity but there are no swear words there. Profanity includes not only swearing, but also taboos of any kind. Cultural taboos, social taboos, religious taboos, etc... I mean, "niggehr"? That ain't no swearing, but it still is a profanity and a big deal in USA for what I know. There are many more examples of that. In Japan, four can be written as "Yon" and "Shi" but writing four as "Shi" is cosidered a profanity because it means death (that was explained to me by a japanese classmate I had in high school).a sword so big that Aphrodite used to please herself because [...]
TL;DR
My opinion is pretty simple, really. Profanity does not limit itself to swearing and stating that swearing is only used by stupid and lazy people is stupid and lazy itself. Regarding whether to use swear words or not, that is personal choice and I know well enough not to get in that matter.
PD: also the textwall up there.
No offense
Last edited by a moderator:


