- Sep 18, 2018
- Reaction score
- First Language
- Primarily Uses
Trying to find legalese to go beyond their decision will have only one result: forcing the company to revoke the generous allowance by putting hard rules into when not to use the RTP.
Perhaps the question should be, "Would I still want to claim it's made with MV if I weren't using the RTP?"
If there's even the slightest bit of code from MV (even if only "just enough to stay in the rules") you'd have to or you'd be infringing the license agreement regardless of anything else.Article 3: User Notification, Etc.
Upon distribution, etc. of the User Game, the User shall provide the following notifications or declarations to users of User Games.
1. Clearly indicate in the attached documentation (in the event there is no attached documentation, in the help file or in a location readily visible to the user of the User Game. The same shall apply hereafter) that the User Game was created using the Software.
You're all missing the point. Andar is saying can you just say what your game is doing that requires such debate? Because at this rate Degica is going to just remove the RTP if this garbage keeps up and no one will have it.
Well why don't you just answer the question then instead of trying to stir up trouble. What are you trying to do that requires such debate in the first place? Why do you think your game is a borderline case that needs such debate?
Well yes, you would. Even if you were to replace all of the RTP and tried your best to hide it. Because the EULA kind of says you have to.
This thread is giving me a cerebral hemorrhage.
Because it is not.If this is true, why are so many people opening recruitment threads for graphic designs and whatnot?
You only need one answer. Whether your game is commercial or free is completely irrelevant - the answer will be the same for both.Please give two answers one for free and the other for commercial.